Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Bills Search » H.R.1247 — 93rd Congress (1973-1974) - Bills
Search Bills

Browse Bills

93rd (26222)
94th (23756)
95th (21548)
96th (14332)
97th (20134)
98th (19990)
99th (15984)
100th (15557)
101st (15547)
102nd (16113)
103rd (13166)
104th (11290)
105th (11312)
106th (13919)
107th (16380)
108th (15530)
109th (19491)
110th (7009)
111th (19293)
112th (15911)
113th (9767)
H.R.1247 — 93rd Congress (1973-1974) [93rd]
Sponsor:
Rep. Udall, Morris K. [D-AZ-2] (Introduced 01/03/1973)

Summary:
Summary: H.R.1247 — 93rd Congress (1973-1974)

There is one summary for this bill. Bill summaries are authored by CRS.

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/1973)

Declares various Congressional findings relating to the insufficiency of existing Federal and State laws to protect persons from the harmful effects of pollution.

Provides that any person who is engaged in any activity which affects interstate commerce and who is responsible for any pollution of air, water, land, or public trust of the United States shall be subject to declaratory or other equitable relief in a class action brought by any person representing the interest of a group or class of persons similarly situated, for the protection from unreasonable pollution.

Grants the appropriate United States district courts jurisdiction to such class actions without regard to the amount in controversy.

Provides that when the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing that the defendant's activity may result in unreasonable pollution, the defendant shall have the burden of establishing: (1) that there is no feasible alternative and that the activity is required for the public health and welfare and (2) that the social and economic benefits of the activity outweigh the social and economic costs.

Provides for the appointment by the Court of a master to take testimony and make a report to the Court in the action.


Major Actions:
Summary: H.R.1247 — 93rd Congress (1973-1974)

There is one summary for this bill. Bill summaries are authored by CRS.

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/1973)

Declares various Congressional findings relating to the insufficiency of existing Federal and State laws to protect persons from the harmful effects of pollution.

Provides that any person who is engaged in any activity which affects interstate commerce and who is responsible for any pollution of air, water, land, or public trust of the United States shall be subject to declaratory or other equitable relief in a class action brought by any person representing the interest of a group or class of persons similarly situated, for the protection from unreasonable pollution.

Grants the appropriate United States district courts jurisdiction to such class actions without regard to the amount in controversy.

Provides that when the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing that the defendant's activity may result in unreasonable pollution, the defendant shall have the burden of establishing: (1) that there is no feasible alternative and that the activity is required for the public health and welfare and (2) that the social and economic benefits of the activity outweigh the social and economic costs.

Provides for the appointment by the Court of a master to take testimony and make a report to the Court in the action.


Amendments:
Summary: H.R.1247 — 93rd Congress (1973-1974)

There is one summary for this bill. Bill summaries are authored by CRS.

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/1973)

Declares various Congressional findings relating to the insufficiency of existing Federal and State laws to protect persons from the harmful effects of pollution.

Provides that any person who is engaged in any activity which affects interstate commerce and who is responsible for any pollution of air, water, land, or public trust of the United States shall be subject to declaratory or other equitable relief in a class action brought by any person representing the interest of a group or class of persons similarly situated, for the protection from unreasonable pollution.

Grants the appropriate United States district courts jurisdiction to such class actions without regard to the amount in controversy.

Provides that when the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing that the defendant's activity may result in unreasonable pollution, the defendant shall have the burden of establishing: (1) that there is no feasible alternative and that the activity is required for the public health and welfare and (2) that the social and economic benefits of the activity outweigh the social and economic costs.

Provides for the appointment by the Court of a master to take testimony and make a report to the Court in the action.


Cosponsors:
Summary: H.R.1247 — 93rd Congress (1973-1974)

There is one summary for this bill. Bill summaries are authored by CRS.

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/1973)

Declares various Congressional findings relating to the insufficiency of existing Federal and State laws to protect persons from the harmful effects of pollution.

Provides that any person who is engaged in any activity which affects interstate commerce and who is responsible for any pollution of air, water, land, or public trust of the United States shall be subject to declaratory or other equitable relief in a class action brought by any person representing the interest of a group or class of persons similarly situated, for the protection from unreasonable pollution.

Grants the appropriate United States district courts jurisdiction to such class actions without regard to the amount in controversy.

Provides that when the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing that the defendant's activity may result in unreasonable pollution, the defendant shall have the burden of establishing: (1) that there is no feasible alternative and that the activity is required for the public health and welfare and (2) that the social and economic benefits of the activity outweigh the social and economic costs.

Provides for the appointment by the Court of a master to take testimony and make a report to the Court in the action.


Comments

Tips